ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Decoding behavior with minimal and interpretable agent models.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how living organisms process sensory information from their surroundings and translate it into decisions is a fundamental problem across biological scales - from biochemical signalling in single-cells to neural computations in animal brains. In this work, we address this challenge by introducing a method to reconstruct general decision processes directly from behavioral observations alone. Our approach is applicable to any biological agent and does not require prior knowledge of its internal mechanisms or its environment. Our agent model is defined by a recurrent dynamics over a discrete set of internal states which encode and process sensory information, and dictate which actions to execute. We validate our method on synthetic agents and demonstrate that we can exactly recover the agent's behavior for non-trivial tasks. Then, we infer agent models from experimental data of rats performing evidence accumulation and of mice making decisions under uncertainty and in changing environments. In both cases, very few internal states suffice to reproduce the observed behavior with high accuracy. Crucially, the immediate interpretability of the inferred dynamics allows to understand the computational process underlying decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.