Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42566485›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Decoding behavior with minimal and interpretable agent models.

Giorgio Nicoletti, Antonio Celani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giorgio NicolettiQuantitative Life Sciences section, The Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7682-0596
Antonio CelaniQuantitative Life Sciences section, The Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0339-1073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how living organisms process sensory information from their surroundings and translate it into decisions is a fundamental problem across biological scales - from biochemical signalling in single-cells to neural computations in animal brains. In this work, we address this challenge by introducing a method to reconstruct general decision processes directly from behavioral observations alone. Our approach is applicable to any biological agent and does not require prior knowledge of its internal mechanisms or its environment. Our agent model is defined by a recurrent dynamics over a discrete set of internal states which encode and process sensory information, and dictate which actions to execute. We validate our method on synthetic agents and demonstrate that we can exactly recover the agent's behavior for non-trivial tasks. Then, we infer agent models from experimental data of rats performing evidence accumulation and of mice making decisions under uncertainty and in changing environments. In both cases, very few internal states suffice to reproduce the observed behavior with high accuracy. Crucially, the immediate interpretability of the inferred dynamics allows to understand the computational process underlying decision-making.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalDecision MakingModels, NeurologicalAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationMiceRats

Identifiers

PMID42566485
PMCPMC13475988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.