ArticlePloS one2026
"Heartbreak and Frustration'' experiences of healthcare providers caring for pregnant women with sickle cell disease in Uganda.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSickle Cell Disease (SCD) is a hereditary hemoglobinopathy that poses significant risks during pregnancy, leading to increased maternal complications such as Vaso-occlusive crises, acute chest syndrome, preeclampsia, preterm labor, and perinatal complications such as preterm births, low birthweights and mortality. The complexities surrounding the management of SCD extend beyond the clinical symptoms and require a comprehensive understanding of the social, emotional, and systemic factors that influence patient outcomes. While existing research has largely focused on the epidemiology and clinical outcomes of SCD in pregnancy, little is known about the perspectives of frontline healthcare providers in resource-limited settings.
objectiveTo explore the experiences of healthcare providers in managing pregnant women with sickle cell disease.
methodsA qualitative approach with phenomenological research design was employed, utilizing in-depth interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) to gather insights from healthcare providers at a regional and national referral hospital. Participants included obstetricians, midwives, and general practitioners working in maternity departments. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes and patterns.
resultsThe study identified several themes based on various health system building blocks and the different levels of the Behavioural Ecological Framework. Individual-level themes included knowledge gaps and awareness, fear and anxiety related to managing a pregnant woman with SCD, and emotional and psychological distress. Community-level influences consisted of religious beliefs, cultural beliefs, as well as myths and misconceptions. At the health systems level, key themes encompassed diagnostic challenges, shortages of critical supplies, lack of management guidelines, and the absence of multidisciplinary and specialized services.
conclusionA multidisciplinary approach that integrates clinical expertise, patient education, and healthcare system reforms is essential for improving maternal and neonatal health in pregnant women with SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.