ArticlePloS one2026
Fire risk evaluation of heat-not-burn products and combustible cigarettes: Thermal exposure of different materials under ambient conditions.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cigarettes have been reported to be a major cause of fire incidents and home fire deaths. Nowadays, alternative tobacco products such as heat-not-burn (HNB) are increasingly popular. In order to assess whether HNB products contribute to minimizing potential fire incidents, we evaluated the surface temperature profiles of HNB products during operation and cigarettes during smoldering or smoking, both when operated alone and when placed on different combustible materials. Experiments were conducted in Perlis, Malaysia, under ambient conditions (26.0°C ± 0. 8°C, 67% ± 4% relative humidity). The temperature of three HNB products and conventional cigarettes were recorded using a thermographic camera. Smoldering cigarettes reached a maximum temperature of 692°C and when smoked, the temperature increased by up to 22%. Puffing also led to an accelerated tobacco combustion in cigarettes. Simulated puffing had a minimal impact on the surface temperature of HNB devices, compared to that of cigarettes. The range of cigarettes temperatures observed in this study (617°C-844°C), were about 13 times higher than those for HNB products (47°C-65°C). Unlike cigarettes, HNB temperatures remained well below the reported ignition temperatures of all the combustible materials evaluated in this study. Under the conditions tested, the evaluated HNB products did not produce visible signs of thermal damage to the materials tested. Nevertheless, lit cigarettes caused visible thermal damage to fabrics, producing burnt marks on mats and dry matter indicating significant fire hazard potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.