ArticlePLOS digital health2026
CAMI-DM: Development and validation of a multi-algorithm model for in-hospital mortality risk prediction in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction - The China acute myocardial infarction registry.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with diabetes constitute a substantial proportion of those with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and exhibit distinct pathophysiological characteristics. However, existing guideline-recommended traditional and generic risk prediction models show limited performance in this specific population. Based on the China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) registry, 6,091 diabetic patients with AMI were enrolled and randomly divided into training and test sets (8:2). A comprehensive set of 62 multidimensional candidate features was extracted, and three feature selection strategies were applied to develop 12 machine learning models across six algorithm categories. All models underwent hyperparameter tuning via five-fold cross-validation in the training set, with the optimal combination selected according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Two post-hoc ensemble strategies-stacking and probability averaging-were then employed to explore various combinations of top-performing models from different algorithm categories. Across six algorithm categories, the predictive models developed using 11 features selected by Elastic Net had the optimal performance. After evaluating various fusion strategies, the ensembled GLM + TabNet model was ultimately selected as the CAMI-DM model 2.0, achieving an AUROC of 0.875 in the test set. To balance the predictive performance and model simplicity, the CAMI-DM model 1.0 adopted a linear framework and was developed using five features from consensus feature selection Strategy, with an AUROC of 0.821 in the test set. Comparative analyses revealed that the CAMI-DM 2.0 outperformed CAMI-DM 1.0 in terms of discrimination, accuracy, calibration, and clinical net benefit. Furthermore, CAMI-DM 1.0, with its simplified structure, still outperformed the GRACE score in the overall predictive performance and generalizability. This study focused on the specific population of AMI patients with diabetes, and for the first time developed two dedicated models to predict in-hospital mortality risk.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.