Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42566338›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

High-dose dexmedetomidine versus dexamethasone supplementation to interscalene brachial plexus block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomized, controlled trial.

Thirada Srinil, Busara Sirivanasandha, Pathom Halilamien, Pawinee Pangthipampai, Jerattikul Phumchaitheerachort, Patcharaon Sangjak, Suppachai Poolsuppasit

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thirada SrinilDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Busara SirivanasandhaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pathom HalilamienDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pawinee PangthipampaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jerattikul PhumchaitheerachortDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patcharaon SangjakDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suppachai PoolsuppasitDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9257-7605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we compared the efficacy of perineural 2 µg/kg dexmedetomidine and 5 mg dexamethasone as adjuvants to bupivacaine for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. We hypothesized that the combination of bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine would prolong analgesia compared with dexamethasone.

methodsOne hundred twelve patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomized to receive 15 mL of 0.33% bupivacaine with either 2 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine or 5 mg of dexamethasone during ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB). The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia (DOA), analyzed as a time-to-event variable using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank testing. Secondary outcomes included the duration of sensory block (DOS) and motor block (DOM), pain scores, incidence and severity of rebound pain, opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Longitudinal pain scores were evaluated using a regression model.

resultsOf 112 randomized patients, 107 were included in the primary analysis. Dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone produced a similar DOA (median, 16.77 vs 12.48 h; median difference in location 5.24 h, 95% CI -0.47 to 9.17; p = 0.655). The dexmedetomidine group had a significantly longer DOS (19.8 vs. 17.3 h; mean difference 2.45 h, 95% CI 0.23 to 4.65; p = 0.031) and DOM (19.9 vs. 17.8 h; median difference in location 2.23 h, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.60; p = 0.008). Postoperative pain score at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours were comparable, as were rebound pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), patient satisfaction, and opioid consumption. The dexmedetomidine group had a higher incidence of intraoperative hypotension (risk difference [RD] 44.4%, 95% CI 30.0% to 59.9%; p < 0.001), bradycardia in the block room (RD 17.9%; p = 0.010) and intraoperatively (RD 27.6%; p = 0.004), and postoperative sedation (RD 10.9%; p = 0.027); however, all hemodynamic events were transient and did not require intensive care admission.

conclusionsPerineural dexmedetomidine (2 µg/kg) was not shown to be superior to dexamethasone (5 mg) in prolonging analgesia when added to bupivacaine for ISB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Although dexmedetomidine prolonged sensory and motor block duration, this did not translate into a longer DOA and was associated with higher rates of hemodynamic instability and sedation. These findings suggest limited clinical benefit and raise safety concerns regarding higher dexmedetomidine doses.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyBrachial Plexus BlockDexamethasoneDexmedetomidinePostoperative PainShoulderAdultBupivacaineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBupivacaineDexamethasoneDexmedetomidine

Identifiers

PMID42566338
PMCPMC13450720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.