ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Rethinking frailty and intrinsic capacity in medical education in Europe through an EAMA student collaboration.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate how intrinsic capacity, functional ability, and frailty are integrated into European undergraduate medical curricula and to develop an educational tool to address identified gaps.
methodsA two-phase approach was adopted. Phase 1 involved an exploratory survey of 19 universities across 10 European countries to assess whether these concepts were included in curricula, how they were taught, and the allocated teaching hours. Phase 2 focused on creating and disseminating an interactive PDF for teachers and students. The tool was pilot-tested and translated into multiple languages, followed by a feedback survey.
resultsFrailty appeared in learning outcomes in 89% of universities (median teaching hours: 2h; range 0-11h), functional ability in 83% (median 1.5h; range 0-5h), and intrinsic capacity in 28% (median 0h; range 0-8h). Teaching was predominantly lecture-based for frailty and functional ability, while intrinsic capacity was taught through both seminars and lectures. The interactive PDF was endorsed by EuGMS and received positive feedback from 71 respondents across 23 countries. 95.8% found it useful; 90% rated content and design as very good. Most planned to use it in undergraduate teaching (66%).
conclusionIntrinsic capacity is scarcely integrated into European medical curricula despite WHO priorities. Embedding this concept alongside frailty requires curriculum-level changes and accessible resources. The interactive PDF offers a practical, multilingual resource to bridge this gap. Broader dissemination and integration into curricula are essential to align education with WHO's Healthy Ageing goals and improve geriatric education and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42566162What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.