Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42566154›Full record

ArticleCNS drugs2026

Impact of Psilocybin on Motor Function in Healthy Participants: A Phase 1, Randomised, Triple-Blind, Dose-Finding Study.

Chiranth Bhagavan, Olivia Carter, Glenn Nielsen, David Berlowitz, Sara Issak, Sabine Braat, Sophie Zaloumis, Zachary Attard, Gina Oliver, Deanne Mayne and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CNS drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chiranth BhagavanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia. cbhagavan@student.unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7983-4280
Olivia CarterMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Glenn NielsenCity St George's, University of London, London, UK.
David BerlowitzInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Sara IssakDepartment of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.
Sabine BraatCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sophie ZaloumisCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Zachary AttardInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Gina OliverDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
Deanne MayneFND Hope International, Salmon, ID, USA.
James RuckerDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Matthew ButlerDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Orwa DandashDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
Alexander Bryson *Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Richard A Kanaan *Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund MRF2012410Wellcome Trust 227515/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychedelics exert widespread effects on brain activity, but their impact on motor function is unclear. This is clinically relevant given the emerging interest in psychedelic-assisted physical therapy for disorders of motor function. This study examined the feasibility and safety of administering movement tasks following low-to-moderate doses of psilocybin in healthy volunteers.

methodsHealthy adult participants were randomly assigned three psilocybin doses consisting of either (1) 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg or (2) 10 mg, 15 mg and 20 mg, with at least 1 week between doses. Movement tasks were administered at 1.5 h, 3 h and 4.5 h post-dose. Participants, physiotherapists and statisticians were blinded to the dosing order. Feasibility was assessed by evaluating completion of the de Morton Mobility Index and Functional Movement Exploration (assessing gross motor function). Safety outcomes included vital signs and adverse events. Additional exploratory motor outcomes included the Action Research Arm Test (assessing upper limb functional performance), Box and Block Test (Original and Modified versions) (combining dexterity with motor speed), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (combining motor speed with intellectual functions) and Reaction Time Ruler Drop Test (assessing reaction time). Alterations in conscious states and blinding efficacy were also assessed. Outcomes were summarised descriptively and with post hoc linear mixed-effects modelling performed to explore dose- and time-related effects.

resultsA total of 13 participants (62% male) were enrolled, with a median age of 33 years (range 22-39 years), median height of 177 cm (155-188 cm) and median weight of 74 kg (51-94 kg). One participant was unable to complete several movement tasks at 20 mg. Nausea (n = 8, 62%) and headache (n = 7, 54%) were the most common adverse events. No serious adverse events or adverse events related to movement task administration occurred. Median values [interquartile ranges] remained near-perfect for the de Morton Mobility Index (92.5-100.0 [85.0-100.0]), Functional Movement Exploration (100.0 [96.0-100.0]) and Action Research Arm Test (56.0-57.0 [52.0-57.0]). Baseline Box and Block Test (Original) median scores (65.0 [60.0-67.0]) improved to 79.0 [70.0-83.0] at 5 mg and 4.5 h post-dose (5 mg-4.5 h), and worsened to 57.5 [51.0-64.0] at 20 mg-1.5 h. Baseline Box and Block Test (Modified) median scores (48.0 [47.0-53.0]) worsened to 43.0 [35.0-45.0] at 20 mg-1.5 h. Baseline Digit Symbol Substitution Test median scores (73.0 [66.0-77.0]) improved to 87.0 [81.0-90.0] at 10 mg-4.5 h, and worsened to 62.0 [54.0-86.0] at 20 mg-1.5 h. Reaction Time Ruler Drop Test scores lacked consistent dose-related changes. Alterations in conscious states were greatest at 20 mg. Participants and physiotherapists correctly guessed the administered dose 53% and 50% of the time, respectively.

conclusionsMovement tasks were feasible during psilocybin dosing up to 15 mg. No significant safety concerns related to movement task participation during the acute drug effects were observed. At 20 mg, impairments were observed in movement tasks that combined motor and additional cognitive functions. These findings inform future studies utilising psilocybin-assisted physical rehabilitation in clinical populations.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621000560897. Date registered: 12 May 2021.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.