ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Frontotemporal dementia with right temporal predominance: a clinical comparison with left-predominant FTD.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe right-temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is well characterised. Whether it should be considered a distinct clinical entity, separate from other syndromes of FTD, remains an open question. The study addressed the issue through a retrospective comparison of clinical characteristics of patients with predominant atrophy in right or left anterior temporal lobe (R-ATL vs. L-ATL).
methodsPatients were identified from a clinical database, diagnosed with FTD, and reported to show temporal lobe atrophy on imaging. Fifty-one patients were selected in whom independent ratings of atrophy were greatest in right or left anterior temporal lobe. Presenting symptoms, cognitive and behavioural characteristics, neuropsychological findings, and diagnostic classification were recorded.
resultsDifficulty recognising people, impaired decision-making, perseverative preoccupations, disinhibition, and loss of empathy characterised the R-ATL group, in keeping with the previous reports. There was, however, overlap in cognitive and behavioural symptomatology in R-ATL and L-ATL, and sensitivity and specificity values were modest. Group differences diminished with disease progression. The most common clinical classification at first assessment in both groups was semantic dementia (SD), with other patients being classified as behavioural-variant FTD (bvFTD), FTD with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or mixed FTD/SD. Not all patients with L-ATL met criteria for semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA).
conclusionsThe data question the notion that R-ATL and L-ATL presentations are separate entities. We argue that a common diagnostic framework for the two is warranted, with classification being based on cognitive/behavioural characteristics rather than neuroradiological grounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.