ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Internal feasibility evaluation of SAM-Med3D for cervical cancer clinical target volume segmentation on planning computed tomography.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate delineation of cervical cancer clinical target volume (CTV) remains labor-intensive and variable. This retrospective single-center study internally evaluated a SAM-Med3D baseline initialized from public pretrained weights and fine-tuned on the study training cohort for prompted cervical cancer CTV segmentation on planning CT. The eligible cohort comprised 182 cases split into training ([Formula: see text]), validation ([Formula: see text]), and temporally subsequent independent test ([Formula: see text]) sets. CT scans were resampled, normalized, and prepared as label-centered 128 × 128 × 128 patches. The SAM-Med3D model was initialized from public pretrained weights and fine-tuned on the training cohort without architectural modification, then assessed with simulated/oracle-guided prompts at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 clicks using Dice, HD95, 3-mm surface Dice, and volume consistency. Mean Dice increased from 0.827 at 1 click to a peak of 0.835 at 7 clicks and was 0.833 at 11 clicks. HD95 decreased from 12.46 mm at 1 click to 9.48 mm at 9 clicks and 10.18 mm at 11 clicks, and 3-mm surface Dice increased from 0.707 to 0.721 at 7 clicks. Thus, multi-click prompting produced modest improvements that plateaued at later clicks. A supplementary risk-guided prompt-selection pilot was performed on the same test set but was treated only as exploratory. Because patch extraction and prompt generation used reference-contour information, all analyses represent controlled upper-bound evidence. This study provides an internal feasibility baseline for promptable cervical cancer CTV segmentation; label-free ROI selection, full-volume inference, external validation, and clinician-in-the-loop testing remain necessary before clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42566113What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.