Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42566084›Full record

ArticlePlanta2026

Characterizing the intrinsic parameters, mass, volume and density, of single pollen grains as a base for mechanical analysis of pollen adhesion.

Martin Becker, Stanislav Gorb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martin BeckerDepartment of Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany. mbecker@zoologie.uni-kiel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0461-6220
Stanislav GorbDepartment of Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThis study combines own experimental data with an extensive literature research to characterize the average single pollen grain mass, volume and density as parameters for future force measurements on pollen. The analysis of pollen grain mechanical properties and adhesion and detachment forces is important to understand the process of pollination in general. However, it requires knowledge of pollen grain mass, volume and density. Despite their importance for research, mass and density have rarely been measured directly, but there is vast data about pollen grain size and shape. Thus, an average value of pollen grain density can provide an estimation of single grain mass for a given volume. However, in this study, we directly measured mass and volume of pollen grains from five anemophilous species by using the weigh-and-count approach and the projected-particle-area approach. This data was used to calculate the density for fresh and dry grains. Furthermore, we combined these results with an extensive literature research to provide a range for the average density of pollen from eudicots, monocots and gymnosperms. We found an uncertainty of up to ± 30% for density calculation, as well as some significant differences between the three plant groups. Methodical details and side effects that can influence pollen grain parameters are discussed. This study is an attempt to extend existing geometrical data about pollen size with the physical parameters, such as mass and density, to provide a background for further biomechanical analysis of pollen grains and pollination process.

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaPollenBiomechanical PhenomenaCycadopsidaPollinationAdhesionDensityMicroscopyPollenPollinationWeight measurements

Identifiers

PMID42566084
PMCPMC13451457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.