ArticleOecologia2026
Metabarcoding reveals the dietary diversity and food web structure of spider functional guilds in a highly diverse subtropical forest.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predator-prey interactions are key to regulating lower trophic levels and stabilizing ecosystem processes. Therefore, understanding prey selection and prey composition of predators is essential, yet especially the small size and diverse diets of predatory arthropods present a significant challenge to conventional field methods. Here, we employed DNA metabarcoding on gut contents of over 1500 arboreal spiders in a subtropical forest in China to construct a high-resolution spider-prey interaction network. Subsequently, we compared prey diversity, composition, starvation rates, and network metrics (predator niche overlap, generality, and prey vulnerability) across different spider hunting guilds and families. Our results revealed an exceptionally broad diet for these spiders, with spiders themselves constituting a significant proportion of prey (i.e. spider on spider predation), besides a wide range of insects, particularly flies and moths. Although, prey composition was broadly similar at high taxonomic levels and functional groups, distinct dietary partitioning was evident at lower (MOTU) taxonomic level. Interaction networks revealed a broader and more generalized diet spectrum of active-hunters compared to web-builders, which resulted in higher diet overlap within the hunting guild (high prey vulnerability and niche overlap). However, network metrics for active hunters were lower than null expectations, suggesting a structuring role of intraspecific competition, while web-builders displayed greater random associations, possibly reflective of the passive mode of prey capture. Collectively, our study offers a high-resolution overview of the dietary niches of subtropical arboreal spiders, revealing how hunting mode shapes their ecological impact and providing significant implications for leveraging these predators in biological control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.