ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Antibacterial effect of chlorogenic acid against Escherichia coli and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum: experimental and molecular dynamic study.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chlorogenic acid (CGA) is a common plant polyphenol with potential antibacterial activity, the mechanisms of which remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CGA on Escherichia coli and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum using experimental and computational approaches. Antibacterial activity was assessed by inhibition zones, changes in optical density, the release of nucleic acids and proteins, and scanning electron microscopy. CGA was found to inhibit the growth of E. coli (IC50 = 1.89 mg/mL; IC80 = 2.58 mg/mL) and L. plantarum (IC50 = 3.80 mg/mL; IC80 = 5.21 mg/mL). However, only E. coli exhibited increased membrane permeability and morphological alterations, whereas no comparable membrane damage was observed in L. plantarum. Molecular dynamics simulations showed that CGA destabilizes the lipid bilayer by increasing the area per lipid, enhancing fluctuations, and promoting the formation of hydrophobic defects. The PMF profile indicates thermodynamically favorable localization of CGA within the hydrophobic region of the membrane. DFT calculations confirmed the amphiphilic nature of the molecule. These results indicate that the antibacterial activity of CGA is associated with disruption of membrane structure, whereas the resistance of L. plantarum may be attributable to specific features of the cellular response and biotransformation of the compound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42566065What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.