Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42566062›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2026

Factors associated with clinically significant nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus patients who present with glomerular hematuria: a cross-sectional study.

Konstantinos Drougkas, Eda Otman, Spyridon Katechis, Maria Pappa, Ozge Yogurtcu, Sofia Flouda, Petros Nikolopoulos, Sophia Lionaki, Aggelos Banos, George Liapis and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Konstantinos DrougkasRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Stree, Athens, 12462, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0143-6404
Eda OtmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Manisa State Hospital, Manisa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9628-4305
Spyridon KatechisRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Stree, Athens, 12462, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8575-5183
Maria PappaRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Stree, Athens, 12462, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1296-0693
Ozge YogurtcuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
Sofia FloudaRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Stree, Athens, 12462, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5423-5847
Petros NikolopoulosDepartment of Nephrology, 2nd Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8994-5267
Sophia LionakiDepartment of Nephrology, 2nd Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-8923
Aggelos BanosRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Stree, Athens, 12462, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5647-6505
George LiapisFirst Department of Pathology, Laiko General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3228-0433
George BertsiasRheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5299-1406
Dimitrios T BoumpasRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Stree, Athens, 12462, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-4671
Antonis FanouriakisRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Stree, Athens, 12462, Greece. afanour@med.uoa.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2696-031X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EULAR recommends kidney biopsy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with glomerular hematuria, whereas both ACR and KDIGO require the presence of proteinuria and/or impaired kidney function. We explored the value of hematuria for the diagnosis of new-onset lupus nephritis (LN). Cross-sectional study of SLE patients who underwent diagnostic kidney biopsy in two independent centers. Clinically significant LN was defined as ISN/RPS class III, IV, V, or mixed III/IV + V. Presentation patterns were categorized by glomerular hematuria, proteinuria, and impaired kidney function. Among patients with glomerular hematuria, regression models identified factors associated with clinically significant LN, and a nomogram was constructed. Of 227 biopsies, 181 (79.7%) showed clinically significant LN. Isolated glomerular hematuria was evident in 11 patients, of whom 9 revealed non-LN pathology; the two LN cases (class II and III) both demonstrated concurrent SLE serologic activity. Among patients with glomerular hematuria (n = 137), independent factors associated with clinically significant LN included anti-dsDNA positivity (OR 12.00, 95% CI 3.36-51.40), higher non-renal SLEDAI score (OR 1.20 per point, 95% CI 1.02-1.46), higher proteinuria (OR 3.77 per 1 g/d, 95% CI 2.00-9.03), and younger age (OR 0.96 per year, 95% CI 0.91-1.00). The combined presence of these factors yielded a predicted probability of 97% (95% CI 90-99%) of clinically significant LN, whereas their absence was associated with a probability of only 6% (95% CI 1-23%). When considering the need for kidney biopsy in patients with lupus, hematuria should be evaluated in the context of overall disease activity; extra-renal and serologic activity substantially increase the likelihood of clinically significant LN.

Indexed as

HematuriaLupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus NephritisAdultAntibodies, AntinuclearBiopsyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKidneyKidney GlomerulusMaleMiddle AgedProteinuriaRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexAntibodies, AntinuclearGlomerular hematuriaKidney biopsyLupus nephritisSystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID42566062
PMCPMC13451229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.