SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Congenital/primary clival meningocele: A systematic review and surgical approach based on a new proposed classification.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skull base meningoceles are extremely rare, most commonly resulting from congenital defects in sphenoid bone fusion. Inadequate embryonic fusion between the posterior sphenoid and the occipital bones may result in a transclival meningocele. Given the absence of a formal classification system for clival meningoceles and clear guidelines for the most appropriate endoscopic skull base surgical approach, we combined an anatomical study and a systematic review to characterize anatomical patterns, propose a preliminary classification, and discuss transoral and endonasal surgical corridors according to each clival subtype. In addition, we report the first known case of a primary clival meningocele successfully treated via a transoral endoscopic approach. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024575282) and received approval from the Ethics Committee (82878724.1.0000.5259). The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were rigorously searched. Anatomical dissection of midsagittal skull base specimens was performed to assess surgical access to clival regions. Seventeen studies comprising 18 patients (mean age 30.7 years; 72.2% female) were included. Clival defects were classified as posterior transsphenoidal (n = 11), spheno-occipital (n = 1), and basioccipital (n = 6). The endoscopic endonasal approach appeared more appropriate for posterior transsphenoidal cases and the transoral route for basioccipital defects. Anatomical dissection studies confirmed that the endonasal corridor is more suitable for the upper third of the clivus and the transoral route for the lower third.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.