ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Diagnostic role of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in pediatric syncope in the emergency department: a prospective study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac syncope in children is a critical risk and demands a prompt, accurate diagnosis. This study aimed to elucidate the diagnostic efficacy and clinical relevance of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in distinguishing between cardiac and non-cardiac syncope in children. A prospective study was conducted in a tertiary pediatric emergency department (ED), enrolling patients who were diagnosed with syncope. Conventional cardiac biomarkers, serum NT-proBNP, telecardiography, and 12-lead electrocardiography were performed. All patients underwent echocardiography, while TILT testing and 24-h Holter monitoring were performed by a pediatric cardiologist in a subset of patients. Electroencephalography (EEG) was performed after cardiac syncope had been ruled out and the patient had been evaluated by a pediatric neurologist. Overall, 197 patients and 50 healthy children were included. Cardiac etiology was identified in 8.6% of patients, while vasovagal, idiopathic, neurologic, orthostatic, and psychogenic syncope accounted for 27.9%, 28.9%, 15.2%, 5.6%, and 7.6% of cases, respectively. The TILT test was performed on only 19.8% of patients, and 46.2% were positive. The median serum NT-proBNP levels were 437.4 ng/L, 44.5 ng/L, and 37.1 ng/L in children with cardiac syncope, non-cardiac syncope, and healthy children (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, and p = 0.971, respectively). The optimum diagnostic cut-off point for cardiac syncope in 7-18-year-old children was 145.0 ng/L, the AUROC was 0.761 (95% CI:0.589-0.934), sensitivity 64.3%, specificity 98.2%, PPV 75.0%, and NPV 97.1%. Conclusion: Serum NT-proBNP levels have been shown to be a promising biomarker for predicting cardiac syncope in children. An NT-proBNP level above 145 ng/L may help identify children at increased risk of a cardiac etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42566053What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.