Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42566047›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Online support needs and preferences for survivors of testicular cancer: a qualitative descriptive study.

Sonam J Shah, Samuel Tate, Mary W Dunn, Matthew I Milowsky, Allison J Lazard, Lixin Song, Deborah Usinger, Maihan B Vu, Matt Cross, Rich DeSelm and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sonam J ShahDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Samuel TateDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Mary W DunnDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Matthew I MilowskyDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Allison J LazardLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lixin SongSchool of Nursing, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Deborah UsingerDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Maihan B VuLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Matt CrossRaleigh Testicular Cancer Foundation, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Rich DeSelmLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Adrian GerstelDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Hung-Jui TanDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. ray_tan@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9681-4919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite high survival rates, testicular cancer survivors face unique, long-term survivorship challenges. Given the demographics of this population, online resources are well-positioned to provide support, yet substantial barriers persist. This study aims to understand how testicular cancer survivors currently use online support resources and to identify their preferences for a future online support platform.

methodsFor this qualitative descriptive study, survivors of testicular cancer were recruited from a survivorship research registry, a survivorship clinic, and a community organization. Researchers conducted telephone interviews on care experiences, survivorship needs, online resource use, and online support preferences. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis with consensus coding and narrative summaries.

resultsTwenty-two testicular cancer survivors were interviewed (median age at diagnosis 30 years old; median survivorship 6 years). Participants used a range of online resources, including medical websites to meet their informational needs and social media to address their experiential and emotional needs. While online resources provided a repository of readily accessible information, multiple issues can limit trust and engagement and cause emotional distress. In envisioning a future survivorship support platform, participants sought a safe, trusted, and user-friendly environment. Desired features include up-to-date medical information personalized to disease type and stage; verified content with moderation and community standards to foster trust; linking information to instrumental support to promote survivorship; and testimonials, peer navigation, and interactive discussion spaces for connection, support, and community. IMPLICATIONS: Survivors of testicular cancer expressed strong preferences for a dedicated, online support platform that integrates reliable medical content with community. These results can guide the development and implementation of evidence-based online survivorship programs and digital health interventions to improve long-term well-being and quality of life among testicular cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsPatient PreferenceSocial SupportTesticular NeoplasmsAdultHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurvivorshipYoung AdultCancer survivorshipOnline supportPeer supportTesticular cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.