Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42565976›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2026

Insulin Efsitora Versus Degludec in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Using Basal Insulin: QWINT-3 Japan Subgroup Analysis.

Hideaki Jinnouchi, Mariko Inoue, Yasushi Takita, Risa Nasu, Rebecca Threlkeld

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05275400 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Design, Open-Label Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LY3209590 Compared With Insulin Degludec in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Currently Treated With Basal Insulin), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05275400 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Design, Open-Label Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LY3209590 Compared With Insulin Degludec in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Currently Treated With Basal Insulin (QWINT-3)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2022 to 2024Enrolled986ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsInsulin Efsitora Alfa, Insulin Degludec
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hideaki JinnouchiDiabetes Care Center, Jinnouchi Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7391-7966
Mariko InoueEli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28 Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 651-0086, Japan. mariko.inoue@lilly.com.
Yasushi TakitaEli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28 Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 651-0086, Japan.
Risa NasuEli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28 Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 651-0086, Japan.
Rebecca ThrelkeldEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7214-4065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe phase 3 QWINT-3 study demonstrated that once-weekly insulin efsitora (efsitora) was noninferior to once-daily insulin degludec (degludec) in reducing glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at week 26 (primary end point) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who had previously received insulin. A subgroup analysis of QWINT-3 participants from Japan is presented.

methodsQWINT-3 was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, parallel-design, open-label study. Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive efsitora or degludec. All participants from Japan were included in this preplanned subgroup analysis. End points investigated included changes in HbA1c from weeks 0 to 26 and throughout the treatment period (weeks 0-78), time spent in the glucose range from weeks 22 to 26 and during the initial dosing period (weeks 0-12), fasting blood glucose from weeks 0 to 78, and incidence and rate of hypoglycemia from weeks 0 to 78.

resultsOverall, 131 participants from Japan were randomized to efsitora (n = 87) or degludec (n = 44). Demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. From weeks 0 to 26, HbA1c decreased from 7.64% to 6.82% in the efsitora group and from 7.56% to 7.13% in the degludec group (estimated treatment difference: -0.31% [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.57 to -0.05]). Rates of level 2 or level 3 hypoglycemic events were generally low and similar between efsitora and degludec. From weeks 0 to 78, one severe hypoglycemic event was reported for efsitora; none were reported for degludec.

conclusionsOnce-weekly efsitora was similar to once-daily degludec in lowering HbA1c in Japanese QWINT-3 participants with T2D already receiving daily basal insulin. Efficacy and safety were consistent with the overall QWINT-3 study population. This subgroup analysis suggests that efsitora is well tolerated and effective as a once-weekly basal insulin in Japanese adults with T2D inadequately controlled with daily basal insulin.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05275400.

Indexed as

Efsitora alfaInsulinJapanLong-acting insulinType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID42565976
PMCPMC13546185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.