ReviewBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Next-generation endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2 - breast cancer: oral SERDs, ER-targeting innovations, and ctDNA-driven ESR1 mutation-guided switching.
Review in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndocrine therapy (ET) is the backbone of HR+/HER2 - breast cancer management, yet acquired resistance commonly emerges despite aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and CDK4/6 inhibitors. A key actionable mechanism is treatment-selected ESR1 mutation, detectable in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) before radiographic progression. SCOPE OF REVIEW: This narrative review summarizes (i) next-generation estrogen receptor (ER)-targeting agents (oral SERDs and novel ER degraders), (ii) the rationale for ESR1-guided endocrine switching, and (iii) practical considerations for implementing a ctDNA-enabled "monitor-trigger-switch" strategy in routine care. KEY CONTENT: Oral SERDs are moving from late-line salvage toward earlier settings, supported by post-CDK4/6 efficacy signals in ESR1-mutant disease and by prospective molecular switching trials. PADA-1 and SERENA-6 provide prospective evidence that intervention at molecular progression can delay radiographic progression in selected patients. However, available SERENA-6 data remain interim, OS is immature, and implementation outside trial settings requires careful attention to assay validity, monitoring burden, cost, and risk of overtreatment from ambiguous low-level ctDNA findings. We also discuss early-stage implications, including emerging signals that adjuvant oral SERDs may improve invasive disease-free survival, raising questions regarding patient selection and integration with existing escalation strategies.
conclusionsctDNA-enabled, ESR1-guided switching has the potential to shift endocrine management from reactive treatment changes at clinical progression toward earlier molecular interception of resistance in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42565973What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.