ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Risk assessment and outcomes of systolic anterior motion in robotically assisted mitral valve repair.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systolic anterior motion (SAM) is a known complication of mitral valve repair characterized by displacement of the anterior leaflet to the left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT) during systole leading to mitral regurgitation (MR) and LVOT obstruction. However, the value of the previously reported risk factors in robotically assisted mitral valve repair (RAMVR) is unknown. We reviewed the peri-operative parameters of 197 consecutive isolated RAMVRs. Patients were retrospectively stratified into low-risk (0-4) and high-risk (5-9) groups based on the total numbers of previously reported risks factors. Operative details and outcomes were compared between groups and the predictive value of the risk factors was analyzed. The overall SAM rate after RAMVR was 3.0% (6/197) with no significant differences between low-risk and high-risk patients (2.4% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.79). Distance from coaptation to interventricular septum (C-sept distance) was the only significant univariable predictor. Both anterior mitral leaflet length and C-sept distance were shown to be discriminatory for SAM in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Flexible annuloplasty bands were used more often in the high-risk group (98.6% vs. 91.1% p = 0.034). The peri-operative outcomes between low-risk and high-risk patients were similar. The incidence of SAM after RAMVR was relatively low. Anterior mitral leaflet length and C-sept measured on pre-operative echocardiography appear to be of some predictive value. Use of flexible bands was potentially a viable preventive surgical strategy. Most of the SAM incidences could be managed with medical management and did not persist post-operatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42565950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.