ArticleJournal of echocardiography2026
Change in the prognostic utility of regional left ventricular longitudinal strain values in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Article in Journal of echocardiography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does statistical significance demonstrate a change in prognostic utility after TAVI?Journal of echocardiography · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the difference in prognostic utility of echocardiographic parameters between pre- and post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) periods. METHODS AND
resultsThis study enrolled 189 patients who underwent TAVI at Kumamoto University Hospital between 2015 and 2023 and had available echocardiographic data for the pre- and post-TAVI periods. Thirty-seven deaths occurred within the follow-up period (median 574 [357-934] days after post-TAVI period). Apical longitudinal strain (LS) in the pre- and post-TAVI periods and mid LS in the post-TAVI period were significantly associated with all-cause death after adjusting for various factors (pre-TAVI apical LS, hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.99, p<0.05; post-TAVI apical LS, HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.82-0.95, p<0.01; post-TAVI mid LS, HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.78-0.97, p<0.05). Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that the area under the curve for mid LS was significantly higher post-TAVI than pre-TAVI (0.65 vs. 0.54, p<0.05). For prediction of all-cause death, the optimal post-TAVI cutoff value for mid LS was 12.5% (sensitivity 75%, specificity 51%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significantly higher all-cause mortality in patients with low mid LS (<12.5%) than in those with high mid LS (≥12.5%) (p<0.01, log-rank test).
conclusionPre-TAVI apical LS was an important prognostic factor in patients undergoing TAVI. In contrast, mid LS and apical LS were significant prognostic factors in the post-TAVI period, indicating a change in the prognostic significance of left ventricular longitudinal strain parameters according to the timepoint in the TAVI procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42565928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.