ArticleApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2026
A Randomized Sham-Controlled Study of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback in an Older Adult Sample.
Article in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV biofeedback) is a promising treatment for improving autonomic regulation and health outcomes. Although HRV biofeedback has demonstrated benefits in younger adults, its efficacy in older adult samples remains unclear. Given age-related declines in heart rate variability (HRV) and corresponding risk for heart disease, stress-related difficulties, and cognitive decline, HRV biofeedback could be an intervention to enhance HRV and improve emotional functioning, sleep, and cognitive performance in older adults. We conducted a randomized, sham-controlled trial wherein 53 healthy older adults were randomized to active HRV biofeedback treatment or sham. Participants completed a five-week HRV biofeedback intervention with assessments measuring HRV at rest, during stress recovery, along with measures of emotional functioning, sleep, and cognitive performance and completed pre- and post-testing along with a 5-week intervention. No significant differences were detected in resting HRV between groups. However, the HRV biofeedback group showed a significant increase in LF during recovery from an acute laboratory stressor (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test), suggesting potential modulation of HRV during recovery, particularly in low frequency oscillatory ranges. Both HRV biofeedback and sham conditions reported improved sleep quality as well as improvements in HF, RMSSD, and SDNN HRV measures, but no significant differences were present for measures of emotional functioning or cognitive performance. High adherence rates in both conditions did not moderate HRV outcomes. Findings suggest HRV biofeedback may enhance aspects of HRV during stress recovery in older adults but there were not specific improvements in resting HRV, emotional health, or cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42565919What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.