Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42565914›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2026

Integrative framework for selecting gene delivery technologies in microalgae for synthetic biology.

Minju Cho, Young Joon Sung

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Minju ChoDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Sookmyung Women's University, 100, Cheongpa-ro 47-gil, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04310, Republic of Korea.
Young Joon SungDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Sookmyung Women's University, 100, Cheongpa-ro 47-gil, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04310, Republic of Korea. yjsung@sookmyung.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea Basic Science Institute RS-2025-00563682National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00459155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microalgae are attractive hosts for synthetic biology due to their ability to produce high-value compounds. Although gene delivery methods have been established in microalgae, their adaptation to synthetic biology applications remains limited. This study provides a comparative analysis of gene delivery technologies for microalgal synthetic biology. Conventional gene delivery technologies, including agitation, microparticle bombardment, electroporation, and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, are currently used in microalgae. However, their application in synthetic biology will require advances in cargo flexibility and engineering compatibility. Non-conventional platforms including cell-penetrating peptides and metal-organic frameworks are emerging, but their practical utility requires broader species-level validation. To guide method selection, this study presents a practical framework for selecting appropriate delivery strategies. In this framework, gene delivery methods are organized according to cargo formats defined by engineering objectives and biological context defined by species-specific cellular characteristics. This framework emphasizes the need for delivery platforms compatible with diverse cargos, recipient species, and engineering applications.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesMicroalgaeSynthetic BiologyElectroporationGenetic EngineeringCargo compatibilityCell wallEngineering objectiveGene deliveryMicroalgaeSpecies-specific characteristicsSynthetic biology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.