ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Effect of reactive soft tissue combined with injectable platelet-rich fibrin for alveolar ridge preservation in severe defect molar sites: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) effect using reactive soft tissue (RST) for socket sealing to guided bone regeneration (GBR) with collagen membrane and sponge in type IV molar sockets. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 40 sites. Bone regeneration outcomes were evaluated by comparing CBCT images preoperatively (T
resultsBoth groups showed a significant increase in horizontal bone width at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm below the crest, with no differences. From T
conclusionsRST combined with DBBM reduced ridge resorption in severe defect molar sites. It shows a better tendency in preserving vertical ridge height and graft retention compared to the GBR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Using RST for socket sealing achieves comparable bone preservation to the GBR in severe defect molars, while simplifying the surgical procedure and reducing costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42565873What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.