ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Prevalence and severity of pubic symphysis radiographic findings in male and female sub-elite football players with and without hip and/or groin pain.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the prevalence and severity of radiographic features of the pubic symphysis in sub-elite football players (soccer and Australian football) with and without hip and/or groin pain, and to compare these features between men and women. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo hundred and thirty-nine football players (184 symptomatic, 55 asymptomatic; 187 men, 52 women) were included. Participants underwent a supine anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. Five pubic symphysis radiographic features were assessed using the Aspetar scoring protocol. Radiographic severity score was defined as the total number of radiographic features present (range 0-5). Two readers independently evaluated all radiographs. Regression analyses adjusted for age, sex (where applicable), body mass index, sport type, and training load compared radiographic feature prevalence and severity between groups.
resultsRadiographic feature prevalence and severity did not differ between symptomatic and asymptomatic participants. Men more frequently demonstrated erosion-like configuration (28% vs 10%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.58, 95% CI 1.32-9.71; p = 0.012) and sclerosis (70% vs 44%; aOR 2.46, 95% CI 1.25-4.84; p = 0.009), whereas bony proliferation and fragmentation were more common in women (54% vs 30%; aOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.66; p = 0.002 and aOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.78, p = 0.017, respectively). Radiographic severity score did not differ between men and women (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 1.21, 95% CI 0.89-1.66; p = 0.227).
conclusionThe prevalence and severity of radiographic features at the pubic symphysis did not differ between symptomatic and asymptomatic football players. However, sex-related differences in radiographic findings were evident.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42565835What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.