Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42565509›Full record

ArticleIET systems biology

CFCPred: Advancing circRNAs-Encoded Peptides Prediction Through Cluster Purity-Guided Resampling and Fuzzy Voting.

Siyuan Zhao, Bin Yu, Lingling Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET systems biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siyuan ZhaoSchool of Information Engineering, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9756-4838
Bin YuSchool of Information Engineering, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin, China.
Lingling LiuSchool of Information Engineering, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1822-2878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have recently been shown to possess coding potential via a cap-independent translation mechanism, challenging their traditional classification as noncoding RNAs and implicating it directly in the pathogenesis of various diseases. Despite growing evidence of the functional roles of circRNAs-encoded peptides (circPEPs) in disease mechanisms, computational methods for predicting these peptides remain underdeveloped. In this study, we introduce CFCPred, a novel tool for circPEPs prediction that combines cluster purity-guided resampling with fuzzy voting (FV) within a traditional machine learning framework. To address the scarcity of known circPEPs, we employ a resampling strategy that mitigates class-imbalance in the training data by generating synthetic samples based on relationships among individual samples, their nearest neighbours and their cluster assignments. Additionally, to tackle class overlap in the testing data, FV enables adaptive model selection and dynamic weight adjustment across the ensemble. This adaptive ensemble integrates predictions from multiple base models to produce a robust consensus classification. Experimental validation across multiple independent datasets demonstrates that CFCPred achieves strong predictive performance. Overall, the tool provides a computational framework that can accelerate research into circPEPs and their roles in disease.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyFuzzy LogicPeptidesRNA, CircularClassification AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsPeptidesRNA, Circularbiology computingdata mininggenomicspattern classification

Identifiers

PMID42565509
PMCPMC13449297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.