Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42565496›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026

Adverse Reactions Identified after Approval of Novel Medicines: Analysis of 339 New Molecular Entities and Therapeutic Biologics.

Ellen Pinnow, Brendan Day, Esther H Zhou, Corinne Woods, Nana Dwumfour, Jenni Y Lee, Ilynn Bulatao, Sanae Cherkaoui, Manish Kalaria, Sonja Brajovic and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ellen PinnowOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9183-4662
Brendan DayOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1446-3017
Esther H ZhouOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4608-6850
Corinne WoodsOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3385-3881
Nana DwumfourOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0411-6123
Jenni Y LeeOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9904-0720
Ilynn BulataoOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4706-0372
Sanae CherkaouiOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7456-1313
Manish KalariaOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5616-5930
Sonja BrajovicOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8260-9535
Nabila SadiqOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0132-0681
Farideh SistaniOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Maggie LeeOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Grace ChaiOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7893-723X
Gerald Dal PanOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-5864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postmarketing safety surveillance data identify safety issues not identified in preapproval clinical trials. We describe the frequency of new safety issues overall and by labeling section and the relationship of the most commonly added safety issues with the cumulative number of prescriptions dispensed via retail pharmacies. Using publicly available sources, we determined the frequency of the most common safety issues added after approval overall and by labeling section (Boxed Warning, Warnings and Precautions, and Adverse Reactions) for new molecular entities (NMEs) and new therapeutic biologics (NTBs) approved between 10/1/2002 and 12/31/2014. There were 339 products in the cohort (278 NMEs and 61 NTBs) with a median follow up of 13.1 years. There were 5,161 new safety issues overall. The most frequently added to the product labeling were anaphylactic reaction, angioedema, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), hypersensitivity, and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), which were added to the labeling of at least 12% of the 339 products. This was similar between NMEs and NTBs, except for cardiac failure, which was among the five most frequent adverse reactions (AR) added to NTBs, while TEN was less frequently added. Most other ARs were added to 10% or fewer products. Among drugs used primarily in the outpatient setting, the mean number of cumulative dispensed prescriptions exceeded 1 million at the time a safety issue was added to the labeling. Many of the most frequently added ARs are drug hypersensitivities. These findings are relevant to practitioners and patients, who should be alerted to the possibility of such reactions.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDrug ApprovalDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug LabelingHumansProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingUnited StatesBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID42565496
PMCPMC13449532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.