ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Bayesian Estimation of the Binomial Parameter in Adaptive Designs With Treatment Selection.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well-known that results from adaptive multi-arm experiments with treatment selection are subject to the bias of the selection process. In this article, we consider designs with a binary outcome that begin with randomized parallel arms. After each of the preplanned interim looks at data, researchers proceed to the next stage with treatments selected according to predetermined rules. The experiment ends with the best arm, and the binomial parameter is estimated from all the observations accrued throughout the experiment in this arm. We present a comprehensive and unified Bayesian approach to the point and interval estimations, which uses a class of design-dependent priors obtained from the reference prior theory (Bernardo 1979). The approach is applicable regardless of the treatment selection rule, and is not affected by the inclusion of a control arm if the treatment selection is based on direct comparisons of the response rates relative to the control arm. The frequentist characteristics of the posterior estimators are studied and compared with alternative methods, where available. To this end, we introduce specific tools that facilitate the evaluation of estimation methods in binary data analysis. We also study the influence of the treatment selection rule and the effect of the prior correction on estimates through various examples. The approach is easy to implement in the experimental practice, and can be used in the interim analyses to help researchers in the treatment selection process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.