Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42565490›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Bayesian Estimation of the Binomial Parameter in Adaptive Designs With Treatment Selection.

Pierre Bunouf, Jean-Marie Boher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pierre BunoufLaboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Marie BoherInstitut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well-known that results from adaptive multi-arm experiments with treatment selection are subject to the bias of the selection process. In this article, we consider designs with a binary outcome that begin with randomized parallel arms. After each of the preplanned interim looks at data, researchers proceed to the next stage with treatments selected according to predetermined rules. The experiment ends with the best arm, and the binomial parameter is estimated from all the observations accrued throughout the experiment in this arm. We present a comprehensive and unified Bayesian approach to the point and interval estimations, which uses a class of design-dependent priors obtained from the reference prior theory (Bernardo 1979). The approach is applicable regardless of the treatment selection rule, and is not affected by the inclusion of a control arm if the treatment selection is based on direct comparisons of the response rates relative to the control arm. The frequentist characteristics of the posterior estimators are studied and compared with alternative methods, where available. To this end, we introduce specific tools that facilitate the evaluation of estimation methods in binary data analysis. We also study the influence of the treatment selection rule and the effect of the prior correction on estimates through various examples. The approach is easy to implement in the experimental practice, and can be used in the interim analyses to help researchers in the treatment selection process.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansModels, Statisticaladaptive multi‐arm designBayesian estimationbinomial parameterfrequentist propertiesreference prior theory

Identifiers

PMID42565490
PMCPMC13449648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.