ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2026
Assessing structural prediction accuracy for nanobody-small molecule complexes.
Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Generative models have transformed structural bioinformatics, enabling antibody and nanobody design against protein epitopes; however, nanobody engineering for small molecule sensing remains largely experimental. In this work, we evaluate seven state-of-the-art structure predictors, AlphaFold3, Chai-1, Boltz-2x, RoseTTAFold3, Protenix, FlowDock and OmegaFold, on nanobody-small molecule complexes. Most predictors accurately reproduced nanobody and CDR geometries but struggled with ligand placement and orientation, although co-folding improved overall accuracy. Contact analysis revealed that CDR1, rather than CDR3, was predominantly involved in ligand binding. Intrinsic confidence scores correlated poorly with experimental accuracy and showed limited power in distinguishing binders from non-binders. Increasing the number of samples and seeds yielded modest gains in accuracy, whereas additional recycles did not. These findings highlight both the strengths and limitations of structure prediction methods for nanobody-small molecule complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.