ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Studies on Counter Electrode Materials in Aqueous Zinc Half-Cell Configurations.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coulombic Efficiency (CE) is the primary parameter that evaluates the reversibility of aqueous zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs), as it directly reflects the stripping/plating behavior of zinc ions. However, this parameter is compromised by a lack of understanding and the standard of testing protocols. In the most ubiquitous method, half-cell tests, the poor understanding of diverse metal substrates, namely the current collectors, compromises the reliability and comparability of the measured data. To timely fulfil this knowledge gap and establish a precise testing protocol, we selected four commonly used metal substrates, copper (Cu), titanium (Ti), stainless steel (SS), and aluminium (Al), to systematically compare their performance and disclose their underlying electrochemical reactions. The Ti current collector was determined to be the most reliable metal substrate due to its outstanding electrochemical performance with zinc ions and strong immunity to side reactions. Moreover, in this study, we found that most applied Cu current collectors exhibit severe side reactions and are likely to yield false-positive results in environments with excessive zinc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.