ArticleCancer science2026
Five-Year Trends in Biomarker Testing and Targeted Therapy for NSCLC: A Patient-Initiated Nationwide Survey in Japan.
Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although multigene testing for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is reimbursed in Japan, optimizing its real-world clinical impact remains challenging. This study updates nationwide testing trends and evaluates the treatment gap between diagnostic results and first-line therapeutic interventions. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database (April 2019 to May 2024). The analysis included 24,047 patients with Stage IV NSCLC across 300 hospitals who underwent diagnostic lung biopsies. Comprehensive multigene testing shifted significantly; testing for ≥ 5 genes rose sharply from late 2021, followed by a marked increase in 6-7 gene testing from mid-2023. Testing for rare drivers (MET, RET, KRAS, HER2) increased substantially. However, approximately 30% of patients remained untested regardless of region or age. While the proportion of patients receiving first-line targeted therapy plateaued at just under 30%, the use of targeted therapies for rare drivers showed a steady increase. In conclusion, multigene testing has rapidly replaced single-gene testing in Japan, narrowing the diagnostic gap for rare oncogenic drivers. Nevertheless, the persistent 30% untested rate emphasizes the need for better shared decision-making to ensure all patients receive comprehensive biomarker evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.