ArticleNeurosurgery practice2026
Posterior Cervicothoracic Fusion During Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Brachial Plexus Avulsion: Sagittal Alignment and Deformity Outcomes.
Article in Neurosurgery practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesDorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning is an established treatment of refractory deafferentation pain after brachial plexus avulsion. Exposure often requires multilevel cervical or cervicothoracic laminectomy, which may predispose to postoperative kyphosis. We evaluated whether concurrent posterior instrumented fusion preserves sagittal alignment and reduces delayed deformity after DREZ lesioning.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing cervical or cervicothoracic DREZ lesioning at a single institution from 2013 to 2025. Patients were grouped by concurrent posterior fusion vs nonfusion DREZ. Radiographic outcomes included C2-C7 Cobb angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis (CSVA), T1 slope, C2 slope, and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis. Nonfusion patients with paired standing radiographs underwent exploratory comparison. Clinical outcomes included pain relief, complications, and reoperation.
resultsTwenty-three patients were included: 8 fusion and 15 nonfusion. In the fusion cohort, median follow-up was 16.0 (IQR: 10.9-21.4). Paired standing radiographs were available in 7 of 8 fusion patients and 3 of 15 nonfusion patients. In the fusion cohort, mean C2-C7 Cobb improved from 2.5° ± 23.1° to 18.3° ± 20.8°, whereas CSVA remained stable. All fusion patients maintained postoperative CSVA ≤40 mm, and 7 of 8 maintained T1 slope minus cervical lordosis ≤20°. No fusion patient developed new or progressive postoperative kyphosis. Durable pain relief occurred in 5 of 8 fusion patients and 10 of 15 nonfusion patients. In the nonfusion cohort, postoperative kyphosis was documented in 8 of 15 patients, new or progressive kyphosis/deformity in 5 of 12 evaluable patients, and reoperation for deformity, instability, or radiographic failure in 5 of 15.
conclusionConcurrent posterior fusion during cervicothoracic DREZ lesioning was associated with preserved sagittal alignment and absence of new progressive postoperative kyphosis. Fusion should be considered when DREZ requires extensive multilevel exposure, particularly across the cervicothoracic junction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.