Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42565177›Full record

ArticlePain reports2026

The modulatory effects of autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR) on pain.

Agnieszka Janik McErlean, Joseph Walsh, Katie Nash, Paige-Shannon Harper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agnieszka Janik McErleanSchool of Sciences, Bath Spa University, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8201-2827
Joseph WalshUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Katie NashSchool of Sciences, Bath Spa University, Bath, United Kingdom.
Paige-Shannon HarperSchool of Sciences, Bath Spa University, Bath, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR) is a cross-sensory phenomenon experienced by an estimated 20% of the population and characterised by a calming, pleasurable tingling sensation triggered by audio-visual or tactile stimuli. Prior work suggests that ASMR experiencers show heightened pain sensitivity but similar pain tolerance to nonexperiencers, and emerging evidence points to possible analgesic effects. Objectives: This study sought to replicate and extend these findings using a larger sample, pain threshold as an index of pain perception, and sex as a variable. Methods: Male and female ASMR experiencers (N = 20) and controls (N = 20) completed algometer testing at baseline, during an ASMR-inducing video, and during a control video. Pain thresholds and visual analogue pain ratings were collected, and participants reported whether they experienced ASMR tingling in each condition. Results: ASMR experiencers reported higher pain ratings than controls ( Conclusion: These findings indicate that ASMR may modulate pain perception and that sex differences influence pain-related responses. They highlight ASMR's potential as an analgesic mechanism and underscore the importance of incorporating sex as a factor in future ASMR pain research.

Indexed as

ASMRAutonomous sensory meridian responsePainPain appraisalPain processingPain thresholdSex differences

Identifiers

PMID42565177
PMCPMC13446973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.