ArticleRSC advances2026
Thioctic acid-based adsorbent for heavy metal removal (Cd
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-molecular-weight organosulfur compounds possess well-defined metal-binding functionalities; however, their direct application as unsupported adsorbents remains insufficiently characterized. Previously reported thioctic-acid-based sorbents have generally employed thioctic acid as an immobilized ligand or as a polymeric component incorporated into supported composite materials, particularly for precious-metal recovery. In the present study, commercially available, unsupported thioctic acid (α-lipoic acid) was directly evaluated, without grafting onto a carrier or incorporation into a composite, for the removal of Cd(ii), Pb(ii), and Cu(ii) from aqueous media. Its adsorption performance was systematically investigated through equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic analyses, supported by physicochemical characterization using SEM-EDX, FTIR spectroscopy, XRD, BET surface-area analysis, and zeta-potential measurements. The equilibrium data were best described by the Langmuir model, indicating predominantly monolayer adsorption at energetically comparable binding sites, while the Freundlich and Temkin models provided complementary information regarding surface heterogeneity and adsorbate-adsorbent interactions. The pseudo-second-order model provided the best description of the kinetic data, consistent with adsorption controlled by site-dependent interactions. Combined FTIR, SEM-EDX, and zeta-potential results supported the involvement of carboxyl/carboxylate and cyclic disulfide functionalities in metal-ion binding through electrostatic attraction and coordination interactions. Thermodynamic analysis indicated that adsorption was spontaneous and exothermic under the investigated conditions. Under optimized conditions, the maximum uptake capacities reached 130, 120, and 100 mg g
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.