ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2026
A serum-clinical composite model for prostate cancer diagnosis: multicenter validation and CRISPR/Cas13a-based detection.
Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Avoidable prostate biopsies remain a persistent weakness of prostate specific antigen (PSA)- and imaging-led prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. The key need is a non-invasive test that improves pre-biopsy risk stratification while remaining potentially translatable to clinical deployment. We developed and validated an end-to-end liquid-biopsy pipeline linking serum miRNA markers, routine clinical variables, machine learning, and CRISPR/Cas13a-based detection. Methods: Candidate miRNAs were prioritized from GSE112264 by differential expression, Logistic Regression, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator analyses, cross-referenced with PCa tissue expression, and measured by qPCR in 712 biopsy-scheduled participants from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (SYSMH), Houjie Hospital of Dongguan (HHD), and Ganzhou People's Hospital (GPH). A three-miRNA PCa risk score (PCaRS) was trained in SYSMH and tested in internal, external, and prospective cohorts. PCaRS and independent clinical predictors were integrated using six machine-learning algorithms; the optimal model was selected by receiver operator characteristic and DeLong analyses. Finally, serum miRNAs in the prospective SYSMH-Pro cohort were quantified with polydisperse droplet digital CRISPR/Cas13a (PddCas13a) to assess whether a CRISPR/Cas13a readout could support a practical miRNA-based diagnostic workflow. Results: Three serum miRNAs (miR-17-3p, miR-504-3p, and miR-6877-5p) were identified as diagnostic markers. PCaRS achieved stable discrimination across the SYSMH Train, SYSMH Test, HHD, and GPH cohorts [AUCs: 0.836 (0.790 - 0.881), 0.832 (0.773 - 0.907), 0.826 (0.721 - 0.932), and 0.820 (0.702 - 0.938), respectively]. PCaRS, f/tPSA, PSA Density, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score were independent predictors of PCa. Among six machine-learning models, the Support Vector Machine based composite model (PCaSVM) achieved the best performance, with AUCs of 0.939 (0.912 - 0.966), 0.899 (0.849 - 0.948), 0.886 (0.806 - 0.967), and 0.905 (0.834 - 0.976) in the four retrospective cohorts and 0.873 (0.772-0.975) in the prospective cohort. In the prospective cohort, a PddCas13a-derived score (PCaCas13aS) achieved an AUC of 0.831 (0.783 - 0.872), with no significant difference from the qPCR-based PCaRS. Conclusions: The PCaSVM achieved satisfactory diagnostic performance, suggesting potential utility for non-invasive diagnosis of PCa. The PddCas13a-based quantitative detection of serum miRNAs presents a feasible approach for diagnosing PCa. Larger prospective multicenter studies are warranted to confirm biopsy-sparing clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.