ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Late neurologic and functional outcomes in patients with severe anoxic brain injury after cardiopulmonary arrest: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest remains challenging, and most patients with severe anoxic brain injury have an indeterminate prognosis despite multimodal assessment. Although delayed awakening has been reported in the era of targeted temperature management, long-term functional outcomes in this population remain poorly described. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study across 18 hospitals to assess the late neurologic and functional outcomes of patients with severe anoxic-ischemic brain injury after cardiopulmonary arrest. Patients who were hospitalized between Jan 1, 2018 and Jan 1, 2023 with anoxic brain injury due to cardiopulmonary arrest were included if they were functionally independent at baseline (CPC 1-2) but remained comatose or in an unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS)/vegetative state at 2 weeks. To study the natural course of disease, we included only patients whose families wanted to continue life-sustaining treatment at the time of inclusion, and those who survived at least three weeks after arrest. Neurological and functional outcomes were assessed longitudinally for up to 12 months using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale. Results: A total of 169 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age 52.9 years). Initial hospitalization was prolonged (mean length of stay 61.2 days). Twenty-seven patients died before hospital discharge. Of the 142 patients discharged, an additional 40 died within 12 months, for a total of 67 deaths (39.6%). Forty-four of these deaths were due to eventual withdrawal of life support, due to deteriorating medical status with superimposed medical complications. Among the 102 patients alive at 12 months, 99 remained severely disabled (CPC 3-4). Only three patients (1.8% of the cohort) regained CPC 1-2 at 12 months. Conclusions: In this large multicenter cohort of patients with severe anoxic brain injury who remained comatose or in a UWS/vegetative state at two weeks, functional recovery with CPC 1-2 at 12 months was rare. Although delayed neurological improvement may occur, favorable functional recovery was rare and prolonged aggressive care was most often associated with death or severe long-term disability. These findings provide additional outcome data to inform neuroprognostication and goals-of-care discussions after cardiac arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.