ArticleClinical and experimental vaccine research2026
A prospective study on the safety and clinical effectiveness of rabies monoclonal antibodies for post exposure prophylaxis in suspected rabies exposures at the anti-rabies clinic of KIMS Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore.
Article in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) will offer immediate passive protection after exposure to suspected rabid animals. These include human RIG and equine RIG, both having constraints for usage. Recombinant technology produced monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have demonstrated greater availability and safety as a substitute for RIG in post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Presently 2 mAb products have been merchandised; World Health Organization has advised monitoring of both the rabies monoclonal antibodies (RmAb) products' in clinical use. To assess the safety and clinical effectiveness of RmAbs for PEP in category III animal exposures. Materials and Methods: All patients with category III exposure who visited the study site and gave their consent were included. A case record form was used to gather information on the sociodemographic profile, bite wound features, PEP given, and specifics of adverse events that occurred after PEP. For a further 6 months, all the research participants were monitored to determine the clinical effectiveness of PEP. Results: The present study included 475 animal bite victims. Among them 41.2% were children, 49.7% were adults and 9.1% were elderly. The adverse events (AEs) among single mAb and cocktail of 2 mAbs were 8.7% and 8.1%, respectively. All the patients who received either of the RmAb experienced mild AEs that resolved on their own or by symptomatic treatment, without any complications. All the trial participants were alive after 6 months following PEP, indicating therapeutic success. Conclusion: The presently available RmAbs are safe and clinically effective in preventing rabies in suspected exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.