Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42565104›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental vaccine research2026

A prospective study on the safety and clinical effectiveness of rabies monoclonal antibodies for post exposure prophylaxis in suspected rabies exposures at the anti-rabies clinic of KIMS Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore.

Ravish Haradanhalli, Sowmyashree U, Poornima M K, Divya Bharathi G

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ravish HaradanhalliDepartment of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0583-0826
Sowmyashree UDepartment of Community Medicine, Neelima Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS), Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3816-3014
Poornima M KDepartment of Community Medicine, Sri Chamundeshwari Medical College and Research Institute, Channapatna, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1055-0590
Divya Bharathi GDepartment of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8518-3285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) will offer immediate passive protection after exposure to suspected rabid animals. These include human RIG and equine RIG, both having constraints for usage. Recombinant technology produced monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have demonstrated greater availability and safety as a substitute for RIG in post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Presently 2 mAb products have been merchandised; World Health Organization has advised monitoring of both the rabies monoclonal antibodies (RmAb) products' in clinical use. To assess the safety and clinical effectiveness of RmAbs for PEP in category III animal exposures. Materials and Methods: All patients with category III exposure who visited the study site and gave their consent were included. A case record form was used to gather information on the sociodemographic profile, bite wound features, PEP given, and specifics of adverse events that occurred after PEP. For a further 6 months, all the research participants were monitored to determine the clinical effectiveness of PEP. Results: The present study included 475 animal bite victims. Among them 41.2% were children, 49.7% were adults and 9.1% were elderly. The adverse events (AEs) among single mAb and cocktail of 2 mAbs were 8.7% and 8.1%, respectively. All the patients who received either of the RmAb experienced mild AEs that resolved on their own or by symptomatic treatment, without any complications. All the trial participants were alive after 6 months following PEP, indicating therapeutic success. Conclusion: The presently available RmAbs are safe and clinically effective in preventing rabies in suspected exposures.

Indexed as

Clinical effectivenessMonoclonal antibodiesPost exposure prophylaxisRabiesSafety

Identifiers

PMID42565104
PMCPMC13446999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.