ArticleRadiology advances2026
Reproducibility of 3.0 T single-frequency cardiac MR elastography for quantification of left ventricular myocardial stiffness.
Article in Radiology advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) allows the non-invasive quantification of myocardial stiffness, but long-interval reproducibility data at 3.0 T single-frequency 140-Hz remain limited. Purpose: To evaluate the short- and long-interval reproducibility of 3.0 T cardiac MRE for left ventricular (LV) myocardial stiffness across healthy volunteers and patients with conditions associated with elevated myocardial stiffness. Materials and Methods: This prospective single-center study included 69 participants: 60 healthy volunteers and 9 with cardiovascular disease (6 with aortic stenosis and 3 with long-standing hypertension). All participants underwent baseline cardiac MRE (scanner: Signa Premier 3.0 T, GE Healthcare, driver: Resoundant), an immediate short-interval rescan (SIR) within 5 minutes, and a long-interval rescan (LIR) after approximately 1 month. Left ventricular myocardial stiffness and octahedral shear strain signal-to-noise ratio were measured independently by 2 readers. Reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), within-subject coefficient of variation, standard error of measurement, and smallest detectable change at the 95% confidence (SDC95) level. Results: Baseline LV myocardial stiffness was higher in the disease group than in healthy volunteers, 11.73 ± 1.01 kPa and 7.80 ± 0.70 kPa (mean ± SD; Conclusions: 3D single-frequency 140-Hz cardiac MRE at 3.0 T provides excellent short- and long-interval reproducibility for LV myocardial stiffness quantification. The SDC95 values may help distinguish true longitudinal stiffness changes from measurement variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.