ArticleJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
India Specific Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Differences of Sexual Development.
Article in Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The management of differences of sexual development (DSD) in India is uniquely influenced by sociocultural norms, legal ambiguities, delayed presentation, and limited access to structured multidisciplinary care. International consensus statements, while scientifically robust, often lack contextual applicability to the Indian healthcare and societal landscape. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop India-specific, ethically sound, and practically implementable consensus guidelines for the management of children with DSD, balancing medical needs, child rights, parental concerns, and medico-legal responsibilities. Methodology: A modified Delphi process was undertaken. Twenty-three multidisciplinary experts participated in iterative rounds of anonymized deliberation and consensus-building, followed by structured discussions moderated by the Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Consensus was defined as agreement by at least two-thirds of participants. The finalized recommendations underwent administrative vetting and were formally ratified by the Government of India. Results: Strong consensus was achieved on standardized terminology, diagnostic pathways, principles of sex assignment, indications and timing of medical and surgical interventions, psychosocial support, and documentation practices. Central to the guidelines is the establishment of Local Multidisciplinary Committees at designated centers, with defined escalation to state and national apex committees. The guidelines emphasize regulated, indication-based interventions, informed parental participation, and protection against unsafe or unregulated practices. Conclusion: These India-specific consensus guidelines provide a uniform, ethically robust, and legally supported framework for DSD management. By integrating multidisciplinary oversight with sociocultural realities, they offer a balanced approach that safeguards child welfare, supports families, and promotes consistent, accountable, and acceptable care across diverse Indian healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.