ArticleRadiology advances2026
Let distortion-guided restoration: a physics-informed learning framework to correct prostate diffusion MRI artifacts.
Article in Radiology advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Susceptibility-induced distortion in single-shot echo-planar imaging (ssEPI) prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can degrade lesion conspicuity, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) estimation, and confidence in prostate MRI interpretation. Conventional correction strategies typically require additional acquisitions and may be limited in severe artifact settings. Purpose: To develop a physics-informed deep learning framework, distortion-guided restoration (DGR), for acquisition-free correction of ssEPI distortions in prostate DWI. Materials and methods: Distortion-guided restoration was proposed to learn the inverse of a physically simulated ssEPI distortion process. Clinical prostate DWI and T Results: On synthetic data, the proposed DGR model achieved the highest peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and lowest normalized mean squared error (NMSE) across low-b DWI (0.089; 95% CI, 0.072-0.105) and ADC maps (0.062; 95% CI, 0.053-0.072), outperforming FSL TOPUP and FUGUE (all Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study suggests that a physics-informed hybrid CNN-diffusion framework offers a practical and acquisition-free solution for correcting severe prostate DWI distortions. It warrants further development for clinical utility and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.