ReviewAfrican health sciences2026
Optometry clinical training and practice at the public health facilities in South Africa: a documentation review.
Review in African health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Infectious diseases, NCDs, child and reproductive health.African health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Three bodies involved in the training of health professionals in South Africa, the Health Professions Council of South Africa, Council for Higher Education and the Department of Health, are expected to align and meet the quality education, training and practice standards of health professions, including clinical training and practice of optometry students at public health facilities. Objectives: To review documents related to optometric student clinical training standards in South Africa, to determine their alignment and ascertain whether they serve their intended purpose. Methods: A qualitative documentation review study using content analysis to collect, explore and compare data from purposively sampled documents, apraised using the international centre for allied health evidence instrument. Results: Two themes emerged from the review, namely; the required optometry knowledge, skills and conduct and the required optometry processes and procedures. However, the frameworks of the reviewed documents vary vastly in terms of quality, transparency and core content. Conclusion: There is general alignment of the defined clinical training and supervision standards amongst universities offering optometric education and the regulatory authorities within the public health facilities in South Africa. There is still a need to standardise the documents guiding optometry student clinical training and practice, with clear, consistent, referenced, accurate and evidence-based recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.