ArticleSexual medicine2026
"Virginity" and the hymen: knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Swiss health professionals.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hymen anatomy and physiology remain poorly understood, even among health-care providers. Misconceptions about virginity testing, virginity certification, and hymenoplasty can lead to harmful practices and place women who are unable to prove their virginity at risk of violence or even death. The aim of this study is to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of gynecologists and pediatricians in Switzerland regarding virginity testing, virginity certification, and hymenoplasty, and to identify gaps to inform future training and professional guidelines. Methods: Gynecologists, pediatricians, and medical students completed a 22-question survey. Group differences were assessed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, with significance set at 5%. Results: A total of 542 participants completed the survey. Overall, 97.5% believed that the absence of bleeding during the first vaginal penetration does not mean that someone is not a "virgin." However, for 13.3% of respondents, hymenal rupture does define the loss of virginity, and 24.5% believed that a gynecologist can determine virginity status, with a significant association with medical practice settings ( Discussion: Women may encounter different approaches depending on the health-care professional they consult, reflecting a lack of standardized care. This national survey highlights substantial knowledge gaps and variability in practice among Swiss health-care professionals, underscores the absence of official guidelines and a coordinated support network, and calls on Swiss medical societies to establish clear, evidence-based recommendations that prioritize patient information, safety, and support while integrating these topics into education, residency training, and medical school curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.