ArticleJournal of oral microbiology2026
Culture-based analysis of oral dysbiosis in post-oncological patients rehabilitated with obturator prostheses.
Article in Journal of oral microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-oncological maxillary defects are commonly rehabilitated with obturator prostheses. This study compared the oral microbiota of post-oncological patients using obturators with that of control subjects wearing conventional removable dentures, focusing on clinically relevant, cultivable microorganisms. Methods: Post-oncological obturator users and denture-wearing controls were examined. Swabs from the oral mucosa, prosthesis surfaces, and resection sites were analyzed using culture-based microbiological methods, including species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Microbial, demographic, and clinical data were statistically analyzed. Results: Obturator users harbored a more pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant oral microbiota than controls, with increased colonization by opportunistic pathogens such as Conclusions: Culture-based analysis demonstrated increased colonization with antimicrobial-resistant opportunistic pathogens in post-oncological patients using obturator prostheses, highlighting the need for intensified hygiene and preventive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.