ArticlePeerJ2026
Integrated chemical and genetic authentication of Polygoni Multiflori Caulis: Refuting diameter restrictions and exposing market adulteration.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Polygoni Multiflori Caulis (PMC), the dried stem of Methods: Authenticated samples of PM, PMH, and PA were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to quantify three key markers, including 2,3,5,4'-tetrahydroxystilbene-2- Results: Chemical analysis revealed that PMC samples across the entire diameter range (2.0 to 25.1 mm) consistently fulfilled the regulatory standards of the Taiwan Herbal Pharmacopoeia (THP), Chinese Pharmacopoeia (CP), and Hong Kong Chinese Materia Medica Standards (HKCMMS), effectively challenging the previously recommended 4 to 7 mm limit. In contrast, authenticated PMH samples lacked both the characteristic marker THSG and the enlarged tuberous roots typical of PM, and PA stem samples exhibited variable chemical phenotypes, with only a small subset meeting official standards. ITS2 sequencing successfully resolved the three taxa by identifying 13 SNPs and 16 distinct SNP genotypes. Notably, the market survey revealed that 82% of commercial samples were substituted with PA, of which 72% contained undetectable levels of the required analytes. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that PMH and PA represent distinct chemotypic lineages and should not be considered interchangeable botanical sources for PMC. The integration of HPLC quantification and ITS2 SNP barcoding provides a robust, multifaceted framework for quality control. Furthermore, our findings suggest that stems across the 2.0-25.1 mm diameter range can meet current pharmacopoeial requirements, providing preliminary evidence that the traditional 4-7 mm restriction may be unnecessarily narrow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.