Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42564870›Full record

ArticleCommunications AI & computing2026

Reservoir computing from collective dynamics of active colloidal oscillators.

Veit-Lorenz Heuthe, Lukas Seemann, Samuel Tovey, Clemens Bechinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications AI & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veit-Lorenz HeutheFachbereich Physik, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Lukas SeemannFachbereich Physik, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Samuel ToveyInstitute for Computational Physics, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Clemens BechingerFachbereich Physik, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical reservoir computing is a computational framework that offers an energy- and computation-efficient alternative to conventional training of neural networks. In reservoir computing, input signals are mapped into the high-dimensional dynamics of a nonlinear system, and only a simple readout layer is trained. In most physical implementations, the interactions that give rise to the dynamics cannot be tuned directly and high dimensionality is typically achieved through time-multiplexing, which can limit flexibility and efficiency. Here we introduce a reservoir composed of hundreds of hydrodynamically coupled active colloidal oscillators forming a fully parallel physical reservoir whose coupling strength and memory can be tuned in situ. The collective dynamics of the active oscillators allow accurate predictions of chaotic time series without time-multiplexing. We further demonstrate real-time detection of subtle hidden anomalies that preserve all instantaneous statistical properties of the signal. These results establish interacting active colloids as a reconfigurable platform for physical computation and model-free detection of irregularities in complex time signals.

Indexed as

Mathematics and computingPhysics

Identifiers

PMID42564870
PMCPMC13446078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.