ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Optimizing intravenous amoxicillin for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Poor aqueous stability limits the use of continuous infusion of intravenous (IV) amoxicillin in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. This study aimed to evaluate whether buffering improves amoxicillin stability and whether co-administration of probenecid enhances amoxicillin exposure. Methods: Amoxicillin solutions (4.17, 50, and 66.6 mg/mL) were prepared in 0.3% citrate-buffered saline (pH 7), water for injection, and 0.9% w/v saline, then stored at 2-8°C for 10 days, followed by 24 h at 32°C. Stability was assessed using a validated assay method and tested against the UK Yellow Cover Document (YCD) acceptance criteria. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed and used to perform Monte Carlo dosing simulations to evaluate the PTA (95% time above MIC) for various IV amoxicillin regimens, with and without probenecid. Results: Citrate buffering did not improve the stability of amoxicillin, and none of the tested conditions met YCD criteria. Co-administration of probenecid significantly increased the PTA for amoxicillin. Administration of 3-6 g of IV amoxicillin every 12 h, with 1 g of probenecid once daily, achieved ≥90% PTA against pathogens with MICs up to 4-8 mg/L depending on infusion durations. For MICs up to 16 mg/L, 4-6 g of IV amoxicillin every 12 h plus 2 g of probenecid once daily achieved a favourable PTA (>90%). Conclusions: Amoxicillin's aqueous instability was not resolved by citrate buffering. However, for patients requiring IV therapy, probenecid-boosted intermittent and extended infusion regimens of amoxicillin appear to be promising alternatives that warrant further clinical investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.