Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42564781›Full record

ArticleNAM journal2026

Impact of the FDA roadmap and perspectives for regulatory use of new approach methodologies in Japanese pharmaceutical companies.

Tetsuro Araki, Hitoshi Naraoka, Yuta Asakawa, Toru Usui, Dai Kakiuchi, Seiichiro Kurashige, Tadahiro Shinozawa, Kimika Nakamura, Takumi Noda, Satomi Nishikawa and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAM journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tetsuro ArakiNon-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), Japan.
Hitoshi NaraokaNon-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), Japan.
Yuta AsakawaNon-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), Japan.
Toru UsuiNon-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), Japan.
Dai KakiuchiNon-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), Japan.
Seiichiro KurashigeNon-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), Japan.
Tadahiro ShinozawaNon-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), Japan.
Kimika NakamuraNon-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), Japan.
Takumi NodaNon-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), Japan.
Satomi NishikawaNon-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), Japan.
Mutsumi SuzukiNon-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmaceutical scientists develop and apply increasingly complex technologies from an expanding toolbox to create more effective and safer drugs. Consequently, the increasing human specificity of new modalities has highlighted the limitations of conventional animal studies. Recently, new approach methodologies (NAMs) have attracted attention for their potential to promote the 3Rs and human-relevant evaluation in pharmaceutical research and development, and have been applied not only in early discovery research but also in regulatory review. In April 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration released a roadmap outlining a stepwise transition from animal studies to NAMs and highlighting drug development tool qualification, raising the urgency for a coordinated response in Japan. The Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA) conducted a survey of JPMA member companies in July 2025 to provide an overview of the status of NAMs in the Japanese pharmaceutical industry and to generate evidence for policy recommendations. While most responding companies were aware of the FDA roadmap, concrete internal responses were limited, and approximately half had not conducted NAMs research. The results indicate strong interest in promoting the 3Rs and improving non-clinical development, but limited experience with NAMs, especially for regulatory applications. Both internationally harmonized guidelines and the establishment of a domestic qualification system, including early consultation channels and a transparent public database, are required to promote the regulatory use of NAMs in Japan. The JPMA could serve as a central hub by facilitating proactive communication among domestic and international stakeholders, thereby promoting the broader implementation of NAMs in regulatory submissions.

Indexed as

Drug development toolsIndustry surveyJapanNew approach methodologiesRegulatory acceptance

Identifiers

PMID42564781
PMCPMC13445526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.