ArticleNAM journal2026
Impact of the FDA roadmap and perspectives for regulatory use of new approach methodologies in Japanese pharmaceutical companies.
Article in NAM journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical scientists develop and apply increasingly complex technologies from an expanding toolbox to create more effective and safer drugs. Consequently, the increasing human specificity of new modalities has highlighted the limitations of conventional animal studies. Recently, new approach methodologies (NAMs) have attracted attention for their potential to promote the 3Rs and human-relevant evaluation in pharmaceutical research and development, and have been applied not only in early discovery research but also in regulatory review. In April 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration released a roadmap outlining a stepwise transition from animal studies to NAMs and highlighting drug development tool qualification, raising the urgency for a coordinated response in Japan. The Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA) conducted a survey of JPMA member companies in July 2025 to provide an overview of the status of NAMs in the Japanese pharmaceutical industry and to generate evidence for policy recommendations. While most responding companies were aware of the FDA roadmap, concrete internal responses were limited, and approximately half had not conducted NAMs research. The results indicate strong interest in promoting the 3Rs and improving non-clinical development, but limited experience with NAMs, especially for regulatory applications. Both internationally harmonized guidelines and the establishment of a domestic qualification system, including early consultation channels and a transparent public database, are required to promote the regulatory use of NAMs in Japan. The JPMA could serve as a central hub by facilitating proactive communication among domestic and international stakeholders, thereby promoting the broader implementation of NAMs in regulatory submissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.