ArticleJPRAS open2026
Normative data for the BODY-Q module in an Australian population and comparison with North American and European norms.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The BODY-Q is a validated patient-reported outcome measure for assessing perceptions of appearance, health-related quality of life and healthcare experiences. Perception of appearance and body image are influenced by cultural, demographic and societal factors that vary across populations. This study aimed to generate Australian normative BODY-Q data. Secondary aims were to understand variation across sociodemographic groups and between geographic regions. Methods: Participants aged 18 years and older and currently living in Australia provided sociodemographic information and completed appearance and health-related quality of life domains of the BODY-Q. Scale scores were compared across socio-demographic groups, and means compared to published North American and European normative data. Results: Data were collected from 805 Australian participants. Women reported lower scores than men in four of the five appearance scales and five of the six health-related quality of life scales. Presence of chronic health condition(s) was associated with lower scores in four of the five appearance scales and five of the six health-related quality of life scales. Higher body mass index was associated with lower scores in all BODY-Q scales. Younger age was associated with worse Appearance-related Psychosocial Distress but minimal difference in other scales. Australian participants showed similar scores to Europeans, and both were higher than in North America. Conclusion: This study provides the first Australian normative scores for the BODY-Q and represents the second publication of normative BODY-Q data internationally. The findings highlight the importance of region-specific normative scores and collecting relevant socio-demographics in patient-reported outcome measures research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.