ReviewJPRAS open2026
Advancing body contouring: A comprehensive review of intramuscular fat grafting techniques, outcomes, and safety considerations.
Review in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intramuscular fat grafting has emerged as a transformative technique in aesthetic surgery, particularly within modern body contouring procedures where high-definition contouring and selective volume enhancement are desired. While subcutaneous fat grafting remains a foundational approach, intramuscular injection has been suggested to provide superior definition, projection, and dynamic contouring in selected anatomical regions. Nevertheless, its clinical adoption remains controversial due to ongoing concerns regarding safety, variable fat retention, and inconsistent reporting of complications. A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library using database-specific combinations of intramuscular- and fat grafting-related terms, yielding 495 reports. Ultimately, 45 studies met the inclusion criteria and were retrieved. Analysis focused on safety, fat retention, and clinical outcomes. The included studies suggested favorable aesthetic outcomes and generally positive reported satisfaction across selected facial, truncal, and extremity applications, although outcome reporting was heterogeneous and often non-standardized. While animal models present conflicting retention data, clinical series have described acceptable volume persistence in selected settings. Safety appeared to be strongly region-dependent. While intramuscular gluteal injection remains associated with a prohibitive embolic risk, non-gluteal ultrasound-guided applications reported low rates of major complications in the reviewed literature, although the available evidence remains limited. In conclusion, this review summarizes reported intramuscular fat grafting techniques and synthesizes the available evidence on outcomes and region-specific safety considerations. Future studies must focus on comparing this approach to subcutaneous grafting in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.