ReviewJPRAS open2026
Cosmetic outcomes of postoperative scar taping after surgical incisions: A systematic review.
Review in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The application of silicone sheets to surgical wounds is currently recommended for hypertrophic scar and keloid prophylaxis after closure of surgical incisions. The use of other types of tapes that differ in cost and biomechanical properties has been reported, although a formal synthesis on this topic within recent years has yet to be undertaken. Methods & materials: MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane were comprehensively searched between January 2000 - December 2025, following the PRISMA guidelines. Included studies evaluated cosmetic outcomes of adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing surgical wound taping following primary wound closure. Randomised controlled trials, comparative cohort studies, and case series (n≥5) were eligible. Results: In the 14 included studies, microporous tapes and Steri-Strips were most popular, encompassing 217 and 159 patients respectively. Cosmetic outcomes were assessed at a mean of 5.13 months (range 21 days to 12 months), using heterogeneous tools including SCAR-Q, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), Vancouver Scar Scale, and Visual Analogue Scales. The application of tapes after primary closure showed significant improvements in scar cosmesis compared to patients without any interventions (n=75), with some evidence suggesting that more inexpensive paper tapes produce clinically similar results to gold-standard silicone sheets. Conclusion: Surgical wound taping using adhesives other than silicone sheets appears to be an effective strategy for improving scar cosmesis. Further randomised controlled trials studies using a consistently layered primary closure methods and directly comparing different types of tapes including silicone sheets using longer follow up and standardised reporting outcomes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.