ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Total Parotidectomy Versus Less-Than-Total Parotidectomy for Early-Stage Low Grade Parotid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Total Parotidectomy Versus Less-Than-Total Parotidectomy for Early-Stage Low Grade Parotid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Total parotidectomy (TP) has been advocated to ensure complete tumor clearance and removal of intraparotid lymph nodes; however, less-than-total parotidectomy (LTT) may offer comparable oncologic control with superior functional outcomes. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared oncologic and functional outcomes between LTT and TP for patients with T1-2 low-grade parotid malignancies. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Four retrospective cohort studies of T1-2 low-grade parotid cancer were included. Patients underwent either LTT or TP. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using Results: The pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference in OS between LTT and TP based on three studies. Across the four studies, RFS was comparable between the two surgical approaches, and statistical heterogeneity was negligible for both OS and RFS. No evidence of publication bias was detected. Conclusion: In selected patients with T1-2 low-grade parotid malignancies confined to the superficial lobe, LTT showed no statistically significant disadvantage in OS or RFS compared with TP based on the available retrospective evidence. However, the high risk of bias across included studies limits causal interprettion. Surgical strategy should therefore be individualized and should prioritize negative margins and functional preservation when oncologically appropriate. Prospective studies with standardized oncologic and functional outcome reporting are warranted. Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.